The Problem with Long Lists in Survey Questionnaires (and The Simpsons)

Matt Kerr • August 4, 2022

By Matt Kerr, IFANR Research Director

In the fifth season of The Simpsons, the family is watching a video from self-help guru Brad Goodman, who suggests that his program can cure a long list of ailments, including “Depression, Insomnia, Motor-Mouth, Darting Eyes, Indecisiveness, Decisiveness, Uncontrollable Falling Down, and Geriatric Profanity Disorder (GPD).” The list is vintage Simpsons, yet it reveals some very real problems that market researchers often see when reviewing client-written questionnaires.


One of the most common problems we see with questionnaires is excessively long lists. The above list is mild compared to some. Clients often have a limited budget and a long list of attributes, products, etc., that they want to test in their research project, and thus they try to cram all of it into one survey. Bad idea.


The average survey respondent does not regularly take surveys, and a long list can be overwhelming. Think of the forms you fill out when you go to the doctor; there is invariably a long list of medical conditions you need to report. It’s the same with market research survey, only your life doesn’t hang in the balance. It is simply unreasonable to expect a respondent to give up their personal time to read through a list that is, in all likelihood, much longer than it needs to be.


And when is a list too long? There is no definitive answer, but if there are twenty items on a list, it is safe to assume that some of the least popular options will garner only one or two percent of the vote. What does that really tell you that you didn’t already know? As an association executive, you probably already knew that those were some of the least popular or most underperforming options. Your goal is to learn which options are in the top three (or four, or five).


The other problem exemplified in the list from The Simpsons is confliction response options. “Indecisiveness” and “decisiveness” are presented as options from which the same person could suffer. Yes, anything is possible, but it is also not likely. We see this in questionnaires all too often. When someone selects conflicting answers, researchers only guess what the respondent meant.


Part of the craft of writing a good questionnaire is to engage the respondent and not to lead them into situations where they can mistakenly report incorrect or conflicting data.


These are just some of the pitfalls that the Institute for Association and Nonprofit Research (IFANR) can help you to avoid when writing a questionnaire.

man and woman shaking hands
By Joseph Bates April 21, 2025
There is an art to conducting a good interview. Regardless of the purpose, be that gaining insight on a new app or collecting feedback for a strategic planning meeting, an interviewer usually has about 30 minutes to make a participant feel comfortable, trusting, and open to sharing their personal thoughts and opinions. This can be a challenging environment for the interviewer to create, so here are the top 3 tips that the IFANR team recommends when conducing qualitative interviews! Begin the interview with a brief introductory conversation so that you and the participant can learn a little bit about each other. While the participant is introducing themselves, listen for any commonalities that the two of you share. The interviewer should be prepared to share a little bit about themselves as well. This brief conversation builds trust between the interviewer and the participant, especially if you happen to have something in common! Remember to ask follow-up questions that allow the participant room to expand on their answer, such as “Can you tell me more about that?” or “Tell me a little more about why you feel that way?” Asking these follow up questions might elicit a more complete and detailed answer than your original question! After reading many books and articles on how to effectively conduct interviews (and after conducting hundreds of interviews ourselves!) we remember this…a strong interviewer knows that we are there to bear witness to the participant’s story, to care about what they have to say, to suspend judgement, and to hold surfacing emotions with respect (Atkinson, 1998). Happy interviewing! References Atkinson, R. (1998). The life story interview. Sage.
baseball on plate
By Matt Kerr April 14, 2025
In 2003, Michael Lewis published Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game. Lewis examined how Billy Beane, the general manager of the Oakland Athletics baseball team, utilized an advanced analytical approach to maximize the talents of his players while still maintaining one of the lowest payrolls in baseball. Using this approach, Oakland performed above expectations and made several postseason appearances. What do you really know? Beane’s analytical approach was controversial. For over a century, baseball executives had built rosters and coaches had made in-game decisions using experience, hunches, and a hodgepodge of statistics. Advanced analytics demonstrated that this approach was often misguided. Today, organizations win by building teams around relevant data, not hunches. Market research tackles association issues in much the same way. How does your association know what it claims to know? Is it experience? Is it from talking to enthusiastic members at the annual conference? Maybe board members with their own pet interests? When you use any of these as your baseline, you are playing your hunches. Market research gives you real data from which to make decisions. Sometimes, your hunches are correct. Many times, they are not. Research is not execution. Hall of Famer Yogi Berra once said “Baseball is 90 percent mental. The other half is physical.” Despite Berra’s questionable math, his point is nonetheless valid. It is not enough to know what to do; one must execute to be successful. Knowing that an opposing batter will always swing at a curveball in the dirt is useless information if your pitcher can’t throw a curveball. Likewise, market research is not often useful on its own. A successful market research study will provide associations with the foundation from which to craft an effective strategy forward. A good research project tells a story. Baseball purists will sometimes maintain a scorecard (“keep score”) when attending baseball games. A holdover from the days before state-of-the-art video boards, a scorecard allows a fan to keep track of what is happening on the field. Part code, part art form, a good scorecard is not a highlight reel, but rather tells the complete story of the game. Baseball fans know that Bill Mazeroski hit a walk-off homer in the bottom of the ninth to win the 1960 World Series for the Pittsburgh Pirates. But do you know why the game was tied before that? The scorecard would tell you why. Good market research endeavors to tell the complete story, too. As an association, you may know parts of the story. You may even have empirical data to back up those parts of the story. But do you know the entire story? IFANR can help you uncover the many layers that will tell a more complete story. Doing more with less. Just like Billy Beane and the Oakland Athletics, associations must increasingly do more with less. Research allows associations to pinpoint actual problems, not perceived ones, and to focus attention on them. Don’t be let a curveball surprise you when you were expecting a fastball.
By Joseph Bates April 7, 2025
The Institute for Association and Nonprofit Research (IFANR) has dozens of years of experience sending survey email invitations. We have perfected our methodology for achieving the best response rates possible. Below are the steps you should follow when creating a survey email invitation. HINT: Do everything you can to make the survey email invitation look as if it is coming from a real person. 1) NEVER use html. 2) ALWAYS have the email invitation appear to come from someone respondents recognize at your organization. Don't use your generic marketing email template or account. 3) Use the sender’s actual email signature block. Again, you need to make this appear to come from someone real. 4) Keep the email SHORT. The FIRST sentence should explain that you are conducting a survey and need the individual to respond. 5) Always personalize the email greeting, such as "Hi Joe"...don't say "Dear Joe" if that is not how the person from whom the email is coming would normally start an email. NEVER say "Dear Member"...as that is too generic. 6) The only link that should be in the email is the link to the survey, and, of course, the opt-out link at the VERY bottom of the email. 7) Send no more than two follow-up reminders that are targeted ONLY to those who haven't completed the survey. 8) Keep the survey in the field for about 7 business days and stagger the reminder emails about two or three days apart. PUT THE DEADLINE IN THE LAST EMAIL INVITE ONLY. 9) Most importantly, make sure to include the following in your subject line: "Please Respond" or "Participation Requested" along with the title of your survey. You need this call to action.
By Matt Kerr March 25, 2025
By Matt Kerr , IFANR Research Director
By Joseph Bates August 25, 2022
By Joseph Bates, IFANR Founder and President
By Matt Kerr August 18, 2022
By Matt Kerr , IFANR Research Director
By Joseph Bates August 11, 2022
By By Joseph Bates, IFANR Founder and President
By Joseph Bates July 28, 2022
By By Joseph Bates, IFANR Founder and President
By Matt Kerr July 13, 2022
By Matt Kerr IFANR Research Director
By Joseph Bates July 7, 2022
By Joseph Bates , IFANR Founder and President
jbates@ifassociationresearch.com